Easy read: http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/poker-skill-vs-chance/
Howard Lederer on skill vs Chance: http://www.gpsts.org/poker-a-game-of-skill
Dreef, M., P. Borm, and B. V. D. Genugten. “On strategy and relative skill in poker.” International Game Theory Review 5, no. 2 (2003): 83–104.http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=29695
The tutorial: During the first half of the tutorial, we will discuss the essays written last week and talk about poker as a game of skill rather than gambling.
The second half of the tutorial we will start thinking about the problems in Week 3.
Assignment: Write a minumum of 500 words explaining either a judge, or a philosopher why poker should or should not be considered gambling.