Loading

Week 4 "Patterns don't go anywhere?" (February 6 - 12)


This week's topic is PATTERNS. It was one of more popular themes the syllabus the participants created

We can all think of some wonderful elementary tasks about making patterns. But there is a big argument among teachers, math curriculum developers and researchers about the value of these tasks. Sure, opponents say, patterns are fun and kids play with them gladly and notice some vaguely mathematical properties. But these activities "don't go anywhere" in terms of developing formal, abstract mathematics.

For example, my math club kids explored consistency and change with growth pattern activities, as shown in this photo:

But they really struggled to translate this into formal math of any sort. They consistently added five counters per leaf, for example, but weren't even aware, initially, of the number 5 (let alone the skip-counting by fives), just focusing on the visual design. I think this struggle led to valuable insights, but some people think it's a waste of time and effort.

THE TASK

Do you think pattern activities are worth the time spent on them, or too slow and too far removed from what mathematics is all about? If you think patterns are worth it, how can you help kids to abstract math out of them? I would love your thoughts, examples, blog finds and wild ideas for this ongoing argument!

Video intermission (a relevant tangent):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U

Task Discussion